This Week's Flagship Article
No Timetable, No Mercy — Iran War Day 9 and China's UN Move to Erase Taiwan | Inside Stories
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Two stories. One crumbling international order.
"Whatever It Takes" — Trump Has No Endgame for Iran and That Is the Problem
Day 9. Over 1,300 Iranians dead. US strikes on 3,000+ targets. Trump promises more — with no timetable, no talks, and no definition of what victory actually looks like.
Nine days into Operation Epic Fury, the US-Iran war has settled into a grinding pattern of escalation with no ceiling and no exit in sight. Trump declared on Truth Social that Iran would be "hit very hard" — warning that new targets including areas and groups of people not previously considered were now in the crosshairs. When asked about a timetable, he said simply: "Whatever it takes."
The numbers on the ground are staggering. US Central Command has now struck over 3,000 targets inside Iran. More than 1,300 Iranians are confirmed dead, with over 50 senior leaders including Supreme Leader Khamenei killed in the opening strikes. Six American service members were killed in Kuwait when an Iranian drone hit their facility. Iran has fired over 500 ballistic missiles and 2,000 drones across the region — forcing Gulf states including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, and the UAE into round-the-clock interception operations. Dubai's international airport was hit multiple times. Kuwait's national security building caught fire. Tehran's Mehrabad Airport was struck and partially destroyed by Israeli forces.
Iranian President Pezeshkian delivered a televised address apologising to neighbouring Gulf states and suggesting that some strikes had been carried out by military units acting without clear command authority following Khamenei's death. He then rejected Trump's demand for unconditional surrender — saying Iran would take that demand "to its grave." Hours later, fresh explosions rocked Bahrain and the UAE. Iran's top security official Ali Larijani vowed that Trump "must pay the price" and that Iran "will not let Trump go." The Arab League called an emergency foreign ministers' meeting. UN Secretary-General Guterres warned that the escalation risks "catastrophic consequences" for the entire region.
"Whatever it takes" is not a strategy — it is a blank cheque with no redemption date. Trump has destroyed Iran's navy, air force, and top leadership in nine days. That is tactically impressive. But without a defined political objective — regime change, nuclear disarmament, a ceasefire framework — this war risks becoming a bleeding wound that drains US resources and destabilises an entire region indefinitely. Iran will not surrender unconditionally. History has no precedent for a nation of 88 million doing so. The question Washington needs to answer now is not how hard to hit — it is what comes after the hitting stops.
China Is Using a 1971 UN Resolution to Erase Taiwan — and It Is Working
Beijing's Foreign Minister declared Taiwan "never was, is not, and never will be a country" — leaning on UN Resolution 2758 as legal cover. The US and Taiwan say the resolution says no such thing.
While the world's attention has been fixed on the Middle East, China has been quietly pressing one of its most consequential long-term campaigns — using a 1971 United Nations resolution to legally erase Taiwan's existence on the world stage. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi stated bluntly at a recent press conference: "Taiwan never was, is not, and never will be a country." His weapon of choice: UN General Assembly Resolution 2758, passed in 1971, which transferred China's UN seat from the Republic of China (Taiwan) to the People's Republic of China.
Beijing's argument is that Resolution 2758 resolved Taiwan's status permanently — declaring it an inseparable part of China with no right to UN membership or international participation. Wang Yi described it as an "iron rule that must not be bent." The PRC has used this framing to block Taiwan from the World Health Organisation, the International Civil Aviation Organisation, Interpol, and dozens of other multilateral bodies. When island nation Nauru switched diplomatic recognition from Taiwan to China in 2024, it explicitly cited Resolution 2758 as its reason.
The problem: legal scholars, the US Senate, and Taiwan's government all say Resolution 2758 does nothing of the sort. The resolution addressed only which government occupies China's UN seat — it never mentioned Taiwan's status, sovereignty, or international standing. The US Senate passed a resolution this Congress explicitly stating that Resolution 2758 "does not endorse and is not equivalent to the One China Principle" and does not determine Taiwan's political future. Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs called Beijing's interpretation "absurd" and "deliberately deceptive." Twenty-three million people in Taiwan never voted on this, were never consulted, and have lived under a functioning democratic government for decades.
This is lawfare — using legal instruments as weapons of political conquest. Resolution 2758 was written in 1971 to settle a seat dispute, not to pre-authorise annexation. China has been expanding its interpretation for decades and the international community has largely looked away. With the world distracted by Iran, Beijing is pressing its advantage at the UN. For Taiwan's 23 million people, this is not an abstract legal argument — it is about whether their government, passport, and democratic existence will eventually be recognised or quietly deleted from the world's official records. The window to push back is shrinking, and the Iran war is making it smaller by the day.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment