This Week's Flagship Article
Trump Took Out Two of China's Allies in 60 Days — Beijing Is Watching | Inside Stories
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
In two months, the US has dismantled two of Beijing's most important strategic relationships. China is watching — and calculating.
Two Allies Down. Is China Next on Washington's Mind?
Operation Absolute Resolve took Maduro. Operation Epic Fury took Khamenei. Beijing has lost two strategic partners in under 60 days — and the US Treasury Secretary is openly saying China should be worried.
In January 2026, US special forces flew into Caracas and extracted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who now sits in a detention facility in New York. On February 28, a joint US-Israeli operation killed Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in Tehran. Both men were among Beijing's closest political allies. Both ran economies that sold discounted oil almost exclusively to China. Both are now gone.
Venezuela and Iran together accounted for roughly 17% of China's total oil purchases last year — a figure that carries real weight for a country whose military runs on fossil fuels and whose factories are the engine of global manufacturing. Nearly all of Iran's crude exports were flowing to China, often through a network of shadow tankers and intermediary ports to avoid US sanctions. That entire supply chain is now severely disrupted.
— US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, CNBC
China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi called the strikes on Iran "unacceptable" and condemned what he described as the killing of a sovereign leader. But beyond the words, Beijing's response has been notably restrained. Analysts at the Economist Intelligence Unit and Eurasia Group both noted that China's reaction to the Iran strikes was "unusually soft" compared to its louder condemnation of the Maduro raid — a signal that Xi Jinping is prioritising the upcoming Trump-Xi summit in Beijing over defending a partner it cannot save.
The broader picture is what makes this significant. The collapse of anti-American governments in Venezuela, Syria, and now potentially Iran has eliminated three major geopolitical drains on US attention — freeing Washington to concentrate resources and focus on what it considers the real long-term competition: China.
This is not a coincidence — it is a pattern. Trump's team has methodically removed two oil-producing states that were bankrolling Beijing's energy security at discounted rates. Whether or not Washington had a grand chess-board strategy, the outcome is the same: China walks into its Beijing summit with Trump having just lost two close allies and facing a genuine energy supply problem. That is not a comfortable negotiating position. What's interesting is that Beijing knows this, and is still choosing diplomacy over confrontation. Xi is pragmatic enough to separate the Iran loss from the trade relationship — for now. The question is how many more such moves China absorbs before the calculation changes.
Xi's Response: Double Down on Self-Reliance
China's new five-year plan lands as Iran burns. The timing could not be more instructive — Beijing is treating these strikes as proof that it must reduce dependence on everything Western, faster.
While diplomatic cables flew between Beijing and Washington after the Iran strikes, China quietly rolled out the headline priorities of its new five-year economic plan. The core message: self-reliance, at speed. The plan targets breakthroughs in AI, semiconductors, aerospace, 6G telecom, quantum computing, and biomanufacturing. Its "AI Plus" strategy aims for AI integration across 90% of the economy by 2030 and a full AI transformation by 2035.
The Iran war has only strengthened the internal argument for this agenda. China had already been building strategic oil stockpiles and diversifying supply routes. But watching its Iranian energy lifeline disrupted overnight — and watching Venezuela fall two months earlier — has made the case for self-sufficiency politically unchallengeable inside the Communist Party. Dependency, in any form, is now a liability.
On the technology front, the US has continued tightening chip export controls. Nvidia remains blocked from selling its most advanced AI chips to China without government licences. China's response is to build its own. Huawei, SMIC, and a network of state-backed semiconductor companies are being pushed to close the gap — not perfectly, but fast enough to reduce the chokehold Washington currently holds.
Every time the US tightens sanctions, blocks a chip, or topples a Chinese ally, it hands Xi Jinping a domestic argument that could not be bought. Self-reliance was already the agenda. Now it is the rallying cry. The Iran strike did not weaken China's long-term position — it accelerated the political will behind the five-year plan. Washington may be winning the short game on energy pressure, but it is simultaneously building the strongest possible case inside Beijing for the kind of technological and economic decoupling that the US says it wants to avoid. That is a strategic contradiction worth watching.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment